A question that's been plaguing me is why aren't Malaysian telco providers providing better service than this? Think about it. How many conversations have you actually had lately that didn't involve the following phrases:
- "Hello? Hello? Helloooooooooo... Hello?"
- "Sorry, what? I can't hear you. Wait ah, let me find better service"
- "You go straight, and then -Do-re-mi tone- hello? hello?"
I've always stood up for Malaysia when people said Malaysians are driving the country into the ground, and I was always adamant that Malaysia isn't as bad as people make it out to be. I'm on the verge of changing my mind.
During my 4 years in Australia, I barely had any problems with my mobile telco service provider. I barely even had to call them. Can't even think of any times I couldn't get through to someone, or had a dropped call.
When I bring that up, most say, "You can't compare us to Australia". I ask, "Why not? Many companies say their lack of infrastructure is due to low transaction volumes in Malaysia, but that doesn't apply to Australia. They have less people!"
Facts:
- Malaysia has a larger population than Australia.
- Australia is physically more than 25x the size of Malaysia.
With some research, I've found that I'm not the only person complaining about it.
Source: Industry Performance Report 2009, Suruhanjaya Komunikasi dan Multimedia Malaysia (MCMC)
NB: CAGR means Compounded Average Growth Rate, i.e. the effective growth rate each year for the time period in question
- In 2009, 6,178 people filed complaints for fixed line and mobile phone services, up from 178 in 2002. This is an increase of over 64% annually.
- Of the 6,178, 2,846 (46%) were complaints pertaining to poor service.
- In 2009, there were 30.4 million mobile subscribers, up from 9.1 million in 2002. This is an increase of just 19% annually.
So what's going on? Haven't the telcos been investing in maintaining and adding on to their infrastructure to cater to increasing demand? Apparently they have.
Sources: Annual reports
*CAGR for Axiata is for 2005 to 2010 only
The table above shows the Net Book Value for Telecommunications Network Equipment for Malaysia's 3 largest mobile telco service providers. According to this, they have been continuously investing in infrastructure since 2002. In RM values, their investments have outstripped the growth of mobile subscribers to 2009.
Again, the question remains: What is going on? Telcos have apparently been investing in infrastructure, but the sheer volume of complaints coming in pertaining to poor service and public debates on the issue of poor network service indicate that it isn't enough.
So, what is the role of MCMC in the whole issue? Their mission includes:
- Ensuring consumers enjoy choice and a satisfactory level of services at affordable prices;
- Providing transparent regulatory processes to facilitate fair competition and efficiency in the industry;
- Ensuring best use of spectrum and number resources
I'm not sure they are doing so, given the state of our telco mobile networks, but that is just my opinion.
I'll stop short of accusing people of things because, let's face it, I'm Malaysian and subject to tyrannical laws on freedom of speech, but take the time to educate yourselves. Don't accept sub-standard services.
You'll note that the MSQoS rates each telco based on reports and complaints filed. Not to whinge, but there is a benefit to complaining.
No comments:
Post a Comment
State your purpose.